Antony and Cleopatra: Shakespearean Connotation

      In Shakespeare's interpretation of the tragedy of Antony and Cleopatra, there is the constant struggle of trustworthiness and loyalty. But really? How is Shakespeare able to develop these characters far enough to make the determination of where their loyalties lie? The answer is connotation. Shakespeare is continually molding the audience's mind to feel a certain way about either Antony or Cleopatra. I believe that, more often than not, Cleopatra has been portrayed negatively as a controlling person that is only holding Antony back. It seems as though Antony is a very progressive character from what I have read so far and this not only explains why he is always feuding with Cleopatra but also his power struggle involving the triumvirate and his lady problems.

      As Antony was being introduced I could tell from the beginning that he was significant considering that he is one of the three leaders of the Roman Empire and a proven soldier. His reputation proceeds from his political stamina as a nobleman with righteous virtues. His presence in Egypt, however, tells us that he's neglecting his own state and shows his less noble side. This is one of the few occasions that Shakespeare allows the audience to view his protagonist as anything but perfect. I believe that the comparison of Antony-in-Rome with Antony-in-Egypt isn’t a set up of good versus evil rather it’s just two different examples of a way a man can live his life. In this case, Cleopatra and her conniving ways cannot always influence Antony because he leaves all of that behind him when he is in Rome because it does not matter, he knows what his true priorities are. Besides, what happens in Egypt should stay in Egypt and I believe that Antony has been respecting that philosophy.

      Meanwhile, as the scenes continue switching, the setting continues confusing, and the plot continues to thicken, Antony somehow always being controlled either by Cleopatra or Caesar. The majority of the characters portrayed throughout this play exude personality traits that I would not consider befriending. Even if you only look at Cleopatra on the surface, she is a power-hungry whore, I mean just look at her romantic past; she is the current lover to Antony, and former lover of both Julius Caesar and Pompey the Elder. Cleopatra definitely has a type and in my opinion she is constantly trying wiggle her way into the pants of the powerful and influential. I can say for sure that Cleopatra definitely has a type and not only does Shakespeare depict that but it can also be recalled from her history. Cleopatra is not all bad, she is a very well developed character that serves as an object of women in power and in love. Cleopatra is also a strategical genius, the way she is able to convince Antony that his devotion to Fulvia is incomparable to the way he is loyal to her. For example, Cleopatra said,
"So Fulvia told me.
I prithee turn aside and weep for her,
Then bid adieu to me, and say the tears
Belong to Egypt. Good now, play one scene
Of excellent dissembling, and let it look
Like perfect honor."
In this quote Cleopatra suggests Antony’s loyalty to Fulvia was false, and claims she should expect no more loyalty than he shows to Fulvia. Multiple times Cleopatra accuses Antony of being loyal only in appearance, as he is too proud to admit that he’s simply a disloyal man. Overall, he is a weak character being controlled by a conniving power-hungry Egyptian which portrays him as weaker but not necessarily negatively. The mention of Egypt also suggests that that's where Cleopatra's true loyalties lie and Antony's decisions and priorities would not sway her.

      If I didn't have to choose which character is portrayed in a more negative light, I wouldn't because overall they are weak and manipulative which will inevitably result in their rightful death. Although Antony is portrayed as a weak and easy influenced protagonist he is still a man of noble power and Cleopatra will always manipulate her way to the top of the negative connotation ladder.

Comments

  1. I am in agreement with you that Cleopatra is a power hungry character constantly manipulating Antony into doing things. However, I implore you to consider which fault is worse. Being easily manipulated or being the manipulator? Both Antony and Cleopatra are portrayed negatively, but I agree that Cleopatra's faults are worse because they are intentional. The quote you brought to light, however, of Antony saying that he was never loyal to Fulvia shows how he is also untrustworthy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kalli.
    Do you realize what you've just done.
    You've completely disregarded the dumbassedness of Antony. You realize he's the one who allowed himself to be corrupted by Cleopatra. Cleopatra, whether or not she was a power hungry whore, did what she did to propel Egypt forward against the power that was Rome. Like I said in Kyle's blog, if I gave you a gun, I wouldn't be responsible if you shot yourself in the foot with it.

    However I really like your first paragraph and how you go into the specifics of how Shakespeare portrays his characters.

    <3

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree that Antony is portrayed in the more positive light even though he is being manipulated by Cleopatra. He is seen as honorable and noble while he is in Rome after all. I have to ask though, is Cleopatra just a power-hungry whore? I know you said she was a strategical genius but I find her to actually be very intelligent altogether. I mean she had the children of two of the most powerful men in the history of the Roman Empire. I think she must have been very intelligent to accomplish that. Either way great blog, two thumbs up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also agree with Keaton, she isn't sleeping with just anyone, she is saving herself no matter what happens, either way she will have a child of the person in charge of Rome. I also believe that Antony is cast in the better light, because is the one being manipulated, so you almost have to feel bad for him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that Antony is portrayed in a more positive light because Cleo is a freaking crazy mf. I do believe she had a method to her madness, but I think there is more to her than that. I think she gets strayed from her path because she falls for Antony.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A well-written blog as usual. I actually agree with a lot of your points, but I came to a different conclusion. I still think Cleopatra is shown in a more positive light due to her dominance over Antony. Antony is a dumbass. You said he was weak, that's why I think he's shown in a more negative light.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I would say I saved the best for last but come on, have you read Keaton Williams' blog post? I completely agree with everything in your blog post. To all the naysayers who believe Cleopatra was being cast in a more positive light think again. Although she is very intelligent she has a child like temper as stated in a different blog post. She loves her power and she is also a whore. If you read the play Kyle you would understand that she started to flirt with Caesar's messenger and would Caesar offered his penor and she accepted wholeheartedly. She would sleep with anyone, please delete your shit reply before my computer short circuits again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know where to begin with this comment, so I won't...

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Things They Carried: Speaking of Courage

Gender in Antony and Cleopatra